by Carl Beuke, Ph.D
What can we learn from world-class performers?
In any profession, most people are average performers, some are 
terrible, and a few are outstanding.  What makes the difference? Over 
the past thirty years, research has examined how people attain 
world-class performance in sport, chess, music, medicine, science, 
aviation, and the military. What can these top performers teach you 
about how to become good at your job? 
|  | 
| www.ads2blog.com | 
It's not about talent
Many
 people believe that it takes a special, inborn talent to become highly 
skilled in a particular area. There is evidence that IQ is often a reasonable predictor of job performance,
 and physical attributes (e.g. height, eyesight) influence some skills. 
Yet efforts to identify individuals with  specific 'talents' prior to 
instruction and practice have not been very successful. There is 
evidence that top performance universally requires extensive practice, 
and research has shown that individuals specifically identified as 
'ordinary' rather than talented can become exceptionally skilled in many
 fields with the right training. The bottom line is that you will attain more success by focusing on what you can improve, rather than worrying about whether you are talented enough.
Don't 'just do it'
One of the reasons that many people see 
'talent' as so important is that many highly experienced professionals 
are not particularly good at their jobs. Research shows that most people
 steadily improve their job performance during their first two years of 
professional experience in a given role. After that, some people keep 
improving, but many stagnate. Some people even start getting worse. This
 is why employers are sceptical of people that claim that they 'must be'
 good at their jobs, just because they have lots of experience.
Why
 do people stop improving? Practice does not always make perfect. 
Practice makes permanent. If you always practice doing things the same 
way, then you will plateau. When many people reach an 'acceptable' level
 of performance they stop making a deliberate effort to improve. They 
make few major mistakes, so their customers seldom complain (although 
they may not always return). Their manager stops pushing them to perform
 better. Continued improvement beyond a certain point takes motivation, time and know-how, and many people lack all three.
|  | 
| www.insightfororganisations.co.uk | 
Deliberate practice: The key to excellence
'Deliberate
 practice' is the name for the particular type of practice that will 
most effectively assist you to improve your performance. Deliberate 
practice is practising your skills at a slightly higher level - 
continually challenging yourself to do better. Deliberate practice is 
characterised by specific goals, accurate feedback, orderly progression,
 and conditions that permit progress.
Specific goals
You need to pinpoint exactly what you want to improve, and how you can improve it. Then you need to practise making the specific improvement. Your goals need to be broken down into small steps that you can achieve within a short time frame, or you will become discouraged.
Swift, specific and accurate feedback
Swift,
 specific and accurate feedback is essential to continued improvement, 
and it is not easy to get. Imagine practising archery blindfolded. Since
 you have no idea how accurate each shot is, you have no feedback on how
 to improve, and your progress is likely to be limited. Now imagine that
 after practising archery blindfolded for six months you get a written 
report on your progress, from some guy who has been dropping in every 
once in a while to observe you practise. Helpful? Perhaps better than 
nothing, but not optimal. Similarly, your six monthly performance review
 does not provide enough feedback to support you to improve.
Unfortunately,
 many professions are somewhat like blindfolded archery. Teachers may 
not realise how much (or little) their students have learnt until exam 
time - too late. A managers' long-term effectiveness in boosting the 
bottom line may not be immediately visible, as investing in improving 
processes and people capability costs in the short run but pays off in 
the long run. Human health is affected by so many factors, and general 
practitioners do so little systematic follow-up of the effectiveness of 
their 'cures', that it is very difficult for most physicians to 
accurately assess their own competence.
What can master chess 
players teach us about the importance of swift, specific feedback? Chess
 might seem like a game where feedback is readily available. You win or 
you lose. But winning or losing a game of chess does not teach you how
 you won or lost. Chess is played one move at a time, and it is feedback
 on the effectiveness of each individual move that is needed. When you 
are a beginner, you get useful feedback in chess, because some of your 
moves are blunders that result in obvious, immediate consequences (e.g. 
losing your queen). At more advanced levels, the consequences of a move 
may not be felt until many turns later.  This makes it impossible to 
progress beyond a certain point just by playing games. Master chess 
players make progress by studying chess problems, where they are shown a
 certain board configuration and need to choose the best next move. The 
'best' move is the one that was made by the grand master who won a 
previous world championship, or the move selected by one of the modern 
computer programmes that can beat any human player. This immediate 
feedback permits progress.
How can you get the feedback you need 
to progress? One traditional source of feedback is a coach.  In business
 and the professions, 'coach' is rarely a job title, rather it refers to
 an experienced colleague who knows what good performance looks like. 
The most important feature that differentiates an effective coach from 
an ineffective coach is the ability to give accurate feedback. If you 
can find people you trust to give you accurate feedback, treasure and 
encourage them. Unfortunately, it is not always easy to know whether 
your coach is giving you accurate feedback.
The other source of 
feedback is 'real world' feedback from your environment. If you are a 
teacher, you can get immediate feedback on how effectively you have 
explained a concept, by asking your student to explain back to you what 
you have just taught them. If you are a manager, you can gain feedback 
on how well you have motivated a team
 member, by observing the change in their performance. Top performers 
seek to build in feedback loops everywhere. Examine how you can do this 
in your own job.
You can get a sense of whether a coach is giving
 you accurate feedback by considering the match between the advice they 
are giving you, and 'real world' feedback based on your observations. 
But be careful not to dismiss feedback just because you don't like it.
When
 you have feedback that you have improved a particular area, you need to
 identify your 'next step'. This updating process should be frequent, 
and guide you toward longer-term goals.
 Also, it helps to have some sort of framework to guide your learning 
(e.g. a list of the most important skills in your job, which you might 
find in your job description or a textbook, or discover by talking to 
other people).
Conditions that permit progress
Deliberate
 practice requires pushing yourself to perform slightly better than you 
normally would. You need to be at your best to achieve this. This means 
being well-rested and fresh. For this reason, doing an hour of cardio to
 'warm up' for sports practice is not helpful. Also, avoid excessive levels of stress
 while practising any complex skill. An effective coach will give 
feedback in a supportive way, to avoid stressing you and interfering 
with your learning.
Ideally, you also need a safe environment for deliberate practice. In
 seeking to improve, you will need to experiment, and consequently 
making more mistakes than normal is part of the learning process. This 
is why athletes treat training very differently from competing. 
Unfortunately, in many professions there is very little time set aside 
for deliberate practice. In some jobs, it is possible to practise 
specific skills in your own time. In others, you may be able to practise
 on the job, although this is not always possible (e.g. if you are doing
 heart surgery, you want to be focused on doing the best job possible, 
not improving some specific skill). In recent years, expert trainers 
have started to design ways of providing skilled professionals with 
learning environments that allow deliberate practice, often with 
excellent results.
What next?
Take action! Set yourself some goals, identify someone who can give you feedback, and set some time aside for deliberate practice.
Source :

 
 

Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar